Kerfuffler ( talk) 11:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 'Fringe conspiracy theories', 'rumor mongering'. And neutrality is not created by rumor mongering. Wikipedia is not the place for fringe conspiracy theories. ಕಿರಣ ( talk) 11:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC) The text of the article is moderately well referenced, and generally does not constitute original research. It's those who are deleting my additions. So it's not me who needs to be given the lecture about NOR, RS and NPOV. And it was I who was trying to bring neutrality to the article. The sources cited are all funded and financed by the makers of the movie. Kerfuffler ( talk) 11:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Well, everything posted in the article is original research. These are very core principles on Wikipedia. ಕಿರಣ ( talk) 10:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC) No, I'm saying you need to follow WP:NOR, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV. I'm giving up on this because the war is not one of editing. So you guys are saying all I need is some money to buy the media, like you have, to keep Wikipedia an encyclopaedia. Kerfuffler ( talk) 10:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Interesting. I have removed it, and since you're already at 3R, will report any further action on this as an edit war. The “contributions” were highly synthesized and biased comments based on primary source material that's not even vaguely reliable.
Wikipedia readers have a right to the whole truth, not just your interpretation of it. Else the warning included now at the top of the section should remain. This is a highly biased source and until a neutral, reputed public broadcaster or media reports it, this section should be removed. Your additions rely on a facebook page and petition created by the same group as a reference. If you have any questions about my edits, raise it here in the talk page. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not an advertising portal of your movie. This is against Wikipedia terms and conditions. My contributions to the page regarding the controversy were deleted arbitrarily. Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.73.49.177 ( talk) 17:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Stop tampering with my additions In fact the dialogue says that America is multi-linguistic country same as India and even without knowing English in America and Hindi in India.you can communicate and survive.(I am also an Indian citizen and find objection at the wrong interpretation of the so called Dialogue by the fellow objecting citizens. Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.205.117.10 ( talk) 17:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Untitled 85 crore is a more accurate estimate given how much longer the film ran than 3 weeks. I think 75 crore, which the sources specifically say was the gross collection at 3 weeks, is inaccurate. This article at the end of the fourth week reported worldwide gross at 85 crores: Given it ran for at least two more weeks, actual gross figures are higher.
The film ran for more than twice that amount of time. See and - Preceding unsigned comment added by Hbasi ( talk īOX OFFICE FIGURES: Worldwide gross was 75 crore at the end of 3 weeks. The domestic gross and international gross are 85+ crore, that may be where the confusion is stemming from (though I have not read anything pointing to 91-100 crore, maybe after satellite rights/video rights are sold). Also, removed bunch of dubious statements from the Impact section.īlacksun ( talk) 23:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Īctually domestic nett and international gross amount to 62-65 crores. These 91-100 crore numbers are completely made up and serve no purpose. All the reliable trade sources I have checked point at a gross of approximately 62-65 crore INR worldwide.
#Youtube english vinglish tamil full movie movie#
Whoever is the person that keeps posting random inflated box office numbers for the movie needs to stop.
0 kommentar(er)
